The Change
The decisive choice facing Christian people today is not picking a church based on worship styles or children’s programs. Nor are the most pressing decisions occasioned by the traditional differences among Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox Churches. For sure, each of these great traditions still places before us distinct doctrinal positions. But in the past, one could assume that with all their differences each preserved the essential Christian gospel and a faithful vision of the life of discipleship, what C.S. Lewis called “Mere Christianity.” But lately that confidence has been shattered. Now every believer in whatever tradition must decide between orthodox voices and progressive ones within their tradition.
The Choice
The orthodox voices call us to listen to all of Scripture, deal honestly with the apostolic teaching, and pay attention to the faithful of all times. They urge us to follow the narrow way of obedience and sacrifice. Orthodoxy warns us not to listen to the voice of the world, which often resonates with our lower natures. In contrast, progressive Christianity values liberal social change more than personal repentance. Whatever deference it gives to Christian language, progressivism is not animated by the spirit of obedience. It views miracles as parables and Christian teaching as wisdom for a less enlightened age. Biblical morality is useful only insofar as it contributes to personal happiness. The true authority for progressivism is subjective feeling validated by the spirit of the times. Its religion like all idols has been crafted by human hands.
My Growing and Shrinking Family
I am a life-long member of a fellowship of believers that reaches back into the early 19th century. I treasure it and remain committed to its central aims…that is, of being simple New Testament Christians without too many “addons.” For most of my life I’ve respected believers from other traditions, but I never felt the desire to join one of their denominations. And I still do not.
But within the past few years I’ve realized that I have more in common with orthodox Roman Catholic, Global Methodist, Orthodox Presbyterian, Greek Orthodox, Baptist, Bible Church Evangelical, Pentecostal, or almost any other group of orthodox believers than with the progressives in my own tradition. I share with the progressive wing a common history, traditions, institutions, heroes and villains, but sadly, we are no longer led by the same spirit. Our diverging paths grow further apart with every step.
Evangelicals: The Group Progressives Love to Hate
Progressives love to hate evangelicalism. The reasons for this antipathy are clear. Progressives lean to the political left; American evangelicals lean right. Progressives adopt a permissive view of sex, gender, and marriage. Evangelicals hold to traditional sexual morality and marriage. Progressives are doctrinally liberal while evangelicals are orthodox. Most progressives are former evangelicals embarrassed by their roots and eager to demonstrate their enlightened credentials.
Pan-Orthodoxy
Evangelicals are orthodox but not all orthodox Christians feel at home in American evangelicalism. It’s too emotional, entrepreneurial, doctrinally shallow, political, culturally narrow, etc. I suggest that orthodox believers need not feel locked into a choice between American evangelicalism and progressive Christianity. Orthodox Christianity was not born with the American evangelical movement. It can be traced back to the New Testament through all the great traditions, despite their cultural differences and distinct doctrinal emphases. It’s in that line of true faith, that spirit of obedience, where I feel most at home. I am brother to all my orthodox brothers and sisters wherever they worship the Lord Jesus. I stand with you. We can work out or bear patiently our differences as long as we share that loyalty. Let’s find each other and stand together “to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people” (Jude 3).
Hello Ron.
It’s good to hear this from you. And it is more significant than we all might initially think.
I’d ask yourself Ron, and anyone else reading, to allow me the imaginary power of transporting you 200 years into the future.
Come with me, and look back on this or the end of the last century and decide which items under discussion (if any) have stood the test of time, and moved from what we might today call ‘semi-progressive’ into the realms of new orthodoxy?
A glaring example i can see from your essay Ron is “politicization”. In the middle ages such thoughts of emancipation and public opinion regarding the ruling classes would have been unheard of, not to mentiion pointless. Nowadays politics’ new found freedom provides an neverending topic for public outrage…
It strikes me that our two millennial history of evolved orthodoxy has at one time or other been ‘newish’ at some time or other.
Without forcing this idea (since i genuinely want people to, at least try transporting themself 200 yrs into the future)- looking back we have the issue of the printed bible in the english language. Will there be English in the future and will people understand it the same way we pretend to today?
And finally, will we understand more or less about the trinity, the essential nature of the Holy Spirit or even the resurrection body, in the future? Based upon the lack of adequate preaching today.
See what you think. I’m interested to hear your views.
Regards JS
LikeLike
One thing I am sure of: the Bible will stand as a permanent witness to the true nature of Christianity. Forms that stray too far from the plane meaning of Scripture will eventually be cast aside. Who wants to die for an invented religion?
LikeLike
Agreed.
I’d like to be a fly on the wall when the minister has to answer questions to a congregation, where one man and one woman (married) can no longer procreate naturally.
Because the food and environment, and body no longer support natural childbirth.
LikeLike